A Great Christmas Movie's Gotta Have... 1. An Existential Crisis. Whether it is personal, professional, or romantic, lots of great holiday movies bite off a big piece of introspection. Many plots take this as far as tackling the topic of suicide, and here I must insert a fact: The suicide rate does not go up over the holidays. That is a dangerous and commonly held misconception. Suicides, sadly, occur throughout the year. But winter can be a time for existential questions. It’s a Wonderful Life (1946) is perhaps the most famous movie example. George Bailey ponders the question of whether the world would be better without him. Suicide is also a theme in director Frank Capra’s other Christmas movie, Meet John Doe, (1941) with Barbara Stanwyck and Gary Cooper. At its core, A Christmas Carol is an existential crisis, so I’ll go on the record with my favorite version, which is the one with British actor, Alistair Sim. A Christmas Carol, (1951), released in Britain as Scrooge, it was crafted with the taut austerity of postwar British cinema. (It was filmed in a studio in Walton-on-Thames whose buildings had been requisitioned for use during the war.) There are no splashy effects here, just a great actor portraying Dickens’ greatest character. 2. Romance You will notice that what I consider the greatest Christmas movies were all made during and just after World War II. This is no coincidence. Hope was the greatest product manufactured on the home front, much of it in Hollywood. Even the more modern A Christmas Story deals with a young boy’s yearning for a rifle in 1940, a time when the country was summoning its courage to stand up to fascism. And many of the holiday romances have wartime themes. In Holiday Affair, (1949) with Janet Leigh, Leigh plays a widowed single mother, unable to move on from her attachment to her husband, who was killed in the war. Robert Mitchum joins her in this sexy romantic comedy with post-war depth, and a really cute kid. The Bishop’s Wife (1944) with Loretta Young, Carey Grant, and David Niven, remade later as The Preacher’s Wife (1996) with Whitney Houston and Denzel Washington, deals with a somewhat stale marriage brought back to life by the wife’s romantic friendship with an angel. Just like the angel Clarence in It’s a Wonderful Life, a heavenly visitor prompts introspection. The angel is a great device, because the unhappy wife gets to have a little fling, but we still have a happy ending when she stays in a loving, but imperfect marriage. (The Preacher’s Wife is a lovely movie, but I haven’t watched it since the sad shock of Whitney Houston’s death. I hope someday I can enjoy it again.) Speaking of remakes, You’ve Got Mail (1998) is a remake of The Shop Around the Corner (1940). Both are delightful, You’ve Got Mail for the unbeatable comedic tone of writer Nora Ephron, and Shop Around the Corner for its adherence to the original Hungarian stage play. There's great chemistry between Jimmy Stuart and lesser known but wonderful actress, Margaret Sullavan. Sullavan and Stuart played summer stock together early in their careers and they have a great rapport. Their antagonistic chemistry sets us up for the denouement of having fallen in love with the last person you’d hope to fall in love with. This is a whole subgenre of romantic film which could be called “When the Wrong Person is the Right Person.” Shop was directed by Ernst Lubitsch, who brings with him the sensibilities of the Berlin theater he cut his teeth on. Though not directly war-related, the poignancy of the modest retail workers struggling to find love as they make ends meet, probably resonated with wartime audiences. The threat of a corporate takeover plot in You’ve Got Mail has some roots in another great holiday romance, Desk Set (1957.) Katherine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy are in their eighth movie together here, and in top form. It has the customary arc of a holiday romance, with our lovers on opposite sides of a workplace conflict, but Desk Set also has an element that is often stripped out of holiday movies these days: a highly intelligent woman with a valuable professional competence. The quintessential Hallmark movie often makes the woman’s profession an obstacle. Her complex intellectual urban life is seen as at odds with the simpler, more honest rural existence. The Hallmark Industrial Complex is a topic for another time, and I admit frankly that I watch them, but the point is, the woman’s smarts are at best window dressing. With Hepburn in Deskset, the woman’s smarts are the sexiest thing about her. Another romance with a smart-but-not-domestic female is a personal favorite of mine, Christmas in Connecticut. (1944). Barbara Stanwyck is living a successful but entirely phony life as a prototypical Martha Stewart, writing a magazine column about an idyllic life on a farm with a husband and a baby, none of which she has. The movie embraces Stanwyck’s lack of wifely attributes, and celebrates her wit and sexiness when she falls in love with a handsome war hero, Dennis Morgan. In its light hearted way, this movie foreshadows the pressure women would feel post-war to give up their wartime freedoms and settle down to traditional roles. And Miracle on 34th Street (1947) deserves a nod here as well, with Maureen O’Hara as an unapologetically competent and successful working woman. I won’t leave the romances without including a favorite of mine from the nineties, While You Were Sleeping, (1995). Sandra Bullock plays a forlorn subway employee with no family, and only a romantic fantasy for companionship. With the object of her fantasy in a coma, Bullock is mistakenly welcomed into the bosom of his family Christmas, where she promptly falls in love with her coma-laden imaginary lover’s brother. Hilarity ensues, and the movie picks up the romantic existentialism of the season, asking the biggest relationship question, “what if I chose the wrong one?” But it also fits into the Crazy-but-happy Family genre, which leads us to our last category: 3. Coming Home Again Luisa May Alcott’s Little Women deals with a loving family living through the hardship of a father away at war. There are several screen versions of this holiday classic. Though I absolutely love Mary Astor as Marmee in the 1949 version, I struggle with June Allyson as Jo, and will take Katherine Hepburn as Jo in the '33 version any day. A highlight for me is when Hungarian actor Paul Lukas sings Tchaikovsky's "Nur wer die Sehnsucht kennt,” evoking the yearnings of a lonely refugee. But the film’s centerpiece is Hepburn, who captures the struggle with gender conformity brilliantly, as she would again in Sylvia Scarlett (1935). In this family-at-home vein, you’ve also got The Man Who Came To Dinner (1942.) Though directed by William Knightly, it’s definitely Capra-esque, with a whacky household in chaos like You Can’t Take it With You, which Capra directed in ’38. (Both are based on stage plays of Kaufman and Hart.) Monty Wooly plays the unwanted houseguest with grouchy grandiosity. It’s a very different character than the sweet old gent he plays in The Bishop’s Wife. Bette Davis would’ve been a shoo-in for the glamorous movie star role, but apparently fought for the role of Wooly’s secretary, whose romance is at the heart of this ensemble piece which includes the fluttery, high-voiced comedic gifts of Billie Burke as the matriarch. And for a family story with romance and homecoming themes, Meet Me In St. Louis (1944) gives you a full year of holidays. Mary Astor is wonderful in a maternal role here as well, and this movie has the most poignant Christmas song ever, Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas sung by Judy Garland to comfort her little sister, Margaret O’Brien, at the prospect of moving away from their beloved St. Louis. I’ve also got Stuart Saves His Family (1995) cued up, because Family Dysfunction and Christmas Fun are synonymous. A somewhat lost gem, though less so these days thanks to Turner Classic Movies, Barbara Stanwyck and Fred MacMurray star in a movie about going home again called Remember the Night (1940). It’s gritty, and more serious than some holiday movies, and I love it. As unlikely a plot as you’ll ever find, MacMurray is a D.A. prosecuting Stanwyck for shoplifting when he ends up bringing her home for the holidays. This is a movie about poverty, generosity, and the value of chosen family. Sadly, as with many films of this era, the people of color, if present, portray servants, often with exaggerated emotions and low intelligence. These cameos are cringeworthy and truly lamentable, through no fault of the talented performers, often intended as background humor to a more serious story. In Remember the Night, MacMurray’s servant is played by Fred Toones. Known by his stage name, “Snowflake,” Toones made no fewer than two hundred movies, often uncredited. These stereotyped elements are also present in It’s a Wonderful Life, where the frisky young war hero chasing the housekeeper, Annie, around the table doesn’t seem so funny these days. It is worth stating the obvious, that because of the prejudices and discrimination of the era, these movies are the stories of mainly white people, though many of these secondary and stereotypical roles were played by stars in their own right. The role of Annie was played by Lilian Randolph who, in addition to making dozens of films, was a radio star and later appeared on various 70s TV shows. There are a slew of movies in which a going home message is overtly religious, signaling a return to faith, and belief in God. These movies have nuns and priests who are appropriately angelic. Loretta Young and Celeste Holm in Come to the Stable (1947), Bing Crosby in Going my Way (Best Picture Winner 1944) and The Bells of St. Mary’s (1945). These are pretty sugary but if I’m in the right mood, they are a treat. White Christmas (1954) is many things. A backstage romance first and foremost, but I’d put it as a coming home story in the fundamental sense of men coming home from war. Bing Crosby and Danny Kaye play two veterans trying to help their old commander. To do so, they reassemble the whole platoon, all of whom leave home on Christmas, reminding us that home is at its essence with those you love, which here is the brotherhood of comrades in arms. The comedy of Mary Wickes, and Rosemary Clooney's crooning are highpoints for me. So, existential crises, life-changing romances, and home and togetherness, that about covers it. But there are no rules when it comes to what comforts. I won’t go so far as to say “I never met a Christmas movie I didn’t like,” but I will watch just about anything, and am often surprised by the emotional punch a mediocre movie can pack. Midnight Clear (2006) – not to be confused with a war movie of the same name from ’92— stars Stephen Baldwin as a homeless, unemployed alcoholic. On Christmas Eve he is desperate, and about to rob a convenience store. If I were a movie critic, which I’m not, I’d call it “uneven,” but on the day I watched it, it was intensely moving and just what I needed. Yesterday I had a cozy double feature of two pretty awful Chrismas movies. Jingle all the Way (1996), starring Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sinbad, made me laugh out loud almost continuously, and in A Christmas Karen (2022). Michele Simms made me cringe and laugh and cry in a Scrooge retelling, totally unsuitable for children, but at times heartwarming. But for many, the best Christmas movie may be no Christmas movie at all. Home may not be an inviting place, or it may not exist anymore. Some people are not in a relationship, and don’t hope to be. Like the alcohol and sugar that others overindulge with, for some, holiday movies can be toxic, and skipping the genre all together may be the way to go. Or you might choose something with a lighter, less sentimental approach. Two of my favorite people to spend time with at the holidays are Nick and Nora Charles. The Thin Man (1934) and After the Thin Man(1936) are set at Christmas and New Year’s respectively. Both are wise-cracking detective stories and, being made during the Great Depression, these movies have a very practical approach. Nick and Nora are madly in love but they don’t get gooey about it. In both movies, Nick and Nora are dealing with comically dysfunctional families, and they throw parties which are full of rowdy, bawdy characters. And they drink. A lot. And now, batting cleanup, I’ll put in some TV picks. I was born in the golden era of Christmas TV special. Rudolf, the Grinch, Frosty, and A Charlie Brown Christmas all debuted in the first years of my life. But also from this era is the lesser-known Rankin/Bass musical The Year Without a Santa Claus (1974). It’s an hour long, motion-animated TV special, in the tradition of Rudolf, Frosty, et al. It’s a nice story, with sweet themes of course, but I love it for its main character, Mrs. Claus, voiced by the fabulous Shirley Booth. Famous to TV audiences as “Hazel,” Booth was a devoted stage actress. She made only four films, and this performance was her last before retiring. Santa is voiced by Mickey Rooney, and the other reason to watch is the songs, which include “Blue Christmas” and “Here Comes Santa Claus.” It’s great for the kids, but if you don’t have kids, you have my permission to watch it anyway. Bonus: the video of this show usually includes a short documentary on the art of motion-animation which is quite fun. (I'll include the clip of my favorite song, "I Believe in Santa Claus", below. Don’t forget that many tv series have Christmas episodes, and the internet being what it is, I’m sure you can find your favorite show’s holiday episodes if you try. One of my favorite series, Monk, has several good Christmas episodes, and one other I love to watch this time of year is Downton Abbey’s Season 2 Episode 9, Christmas at Downton Abbey featuring Matthew and Mary’s romance. Here in San Francisco, you can even go see Golden Girls Live: The Christmas Episodes, which is an annual performance. The Dean Martin Christmas Special 1968 is a blast, if you can look past the sexism and booze jokes, and is available on YouTube. And finally, speaking of YouTube, a note on how we watch. It changes from year to year, but right now you can watch The Bishop’s Wife on YouTube, and probably some of the othrs listed here. I take advantage of all the different video platforms, but I still miss the unity of the big three channels. I well remember waiting with great anticipation for the night that Rudolf or Frosty or the Grinch would be aired, and hearing the words “it’s on, it’s on!” ringing throughout the house. So, as we sit down at the Christmas Movie Table, which is groaning and heavy with streaming, cable, and rentals, let us not forget the lowliest of the video universe, broadcast. Broadcast is the Charlie Brown’s tree of TV viewing options. Here in the East Bay Area, It’s a Wonderful Life sometimes plays on Christmas Eve on the City of Richmond’s public access station. It’s a grainy old print, but knowing that others are experiencing the jingle of Clarence’s bell at exactly the same time as I am, something about that just feels like Christmas. Wishing you and all those dear to you the happiest of holidays! Love, Lisa I am often confounded by the behaviors of human parents, especially when they are hurrying their children away from my little dog, “Gadget.” Gadget has butterfly ears and a black button nose. He is fascinating to little children and babies and loves nothing more than to be petted by them. When parents out on a casual walk can’t spare even a few seconds to allow the child to delight in something that obviously delights him, well, it kind of makes me wonder about priorities. There used to be a child in my neighborhood who particularly loved dogs. She was mesmerized at the sight of me walking any one of my pack. But on the child’s walks around the block, even as a toddler, her parents never had time to say hello. As the child grew up she was able to take walks by herself, and once free to do so, she always stopped to visit with my dogs and was highly curious to learn their names, where I got them, what breed they were, and everything I could tell her about them. She also spoke with pride about her passionate love of all creatures, great and small. If she had rented a billboard that said “I LOVE ANIMALS” this girl could not have communicated it more clearly. But her parents had never given her a pet. I don’t know the family well. Perhaps there were allergies involved, or bad experiences with pets or animals, but it seemed a sad thing to me, and slightly ironic. Both parents worked from home. Their job? Running a website on child rearing. I’ve seen a similar blindness in people’s attitudes about their dogs. There’s a hurry, a perfectionism, and a set of priorities that often strikes me as a bit off. Perhaps it’s an American thing. Or a twenty-first century thing. But sometimes, we seem to have more important things to do than to love. At first with a new dog, as is in human relationships and marriage, there’s a bloom on the rose and people have stardust in the eyes. If there is an awareness of a problem, it is minimized, or assumed that the somewhere down the line, it will be solved. But mostly, it’s a honeymoon phase. That’s the time when everyone insists that their dog will be a therapy dog because the world must be made to benefit from this magnificent creature, and the dog will be an agility dog because look at the genius way it jumps and plays! These days also, this dog, this perfect four-legged creature unlike any other, will be an Instagram star, and do puzzles and use talk buttons, in between its job of comforting the sick and bereaved and winning gold ribbons, of course. But even when the expectations are more modest, things don’t always go to plan. A friend of mine recently adopted a new dog. This friend, after previously having had only big dogs, finally adopted a sweet little dog, and was looking forward to having a lap dog as she relaxed and watched TV. But guess what? The dog is not a cuddler. Doesn’t like it. Doesn’t want it. Won’t do it. And the dog has some behavioral issues that make the possibility of adding another dog to the pack pretty slim. So where does that leave my friend? The dog was a rescue, and my friend hated the idea of returning her to the rescue group, but frankly, she was considering it. This friend has been through a lot, and I could see how she might’ve made that choice. But when it came down to it, she realized something: she loved the dog. This little dog, who didn’t cuddle (and would never meet my friend’s original expectation,) was now beloved, and she wasn’t going anywhere. And it can be a big loss to discover that a dog can’t handle the dog park, or won’t sit with you at a café, or doesn’t like kids. I’ve learned in the very hardest of ways, (stories for another day,) that some problems cannot be fixed. Certain kinds of experts and professionals would consider such a statement an outrage. Some of them have tv shows, their own dogfood endorsements, and claim they can fix any issue, in any dog. And in their defense, dog professionals so often deal with dog people in denial, you kind of can’t blame those who have a certain fierceness of their “can do” attitudes. They’re used to people saying “I tried, but the dog won’t learn,” or, “oh that’s not a problem, he just wants to play,” even as the dog is chewing off half your face. But such over-optimism does a disservice to both dog and human. Fortunately a lot of professionals, and you’ll meet some of them in this space, appreciate the deep pain of a dog problem that can’t be fixed. (A solution can be found, but the solution makes the problem livable, or manageable, but it doesn’t make it go away.) None of this is to imply that if you are having difficulty, especially anything impacting your dog’s safety or the safety of others, that you should not get professional help and work hard to solve the problem. But as author and animal behaviorist Patricia O’Connell notes, “be sure to find someone who is well-versed in positive reinforcement and who is just as kind to you as they are to your dog.” O’Connell is an example of a professional who meets the problems of both humans and canines head on with realism, empathy, and wisdom, as evidenced in one chapter title, “When Your Dog Needs Another Home and When You Need a Hug.” These sorts of enlightened dog pros also know that within the crux of a dog’s difficulty may lie that dog person’s greatest moment of opportunity. It is a chance to love and accept the dog as he or she is, while also loving one’s self. I cannot remember her name, and so apologize for not crediting her, but I took an online class about reactivity in which a guest lecturer expressed this moment of realization beautifully. She was a professional therapist. She had gotten a dog she thought would be a wonderful companion, not only for her, but for her patients. She pictured the dog sitting by her side as she worked, the dog’s calm presence and unconditional love radiating throughout the session, helping the troubled people to open up and feel safe. But as fate would have it, the dog didn’t like strangers, or even people that much. The dog was in a constant state of stress with this parade of newcomers and the dog’s agitation was anything but therapeutic. As the woman came to grips with the situation, she also came to love this dog, this being, for itself, not for what it could do for her. But there was also a sense of loss. When I heard this woman’s story I was in the process of training (and loving) my first reactive dog, and I wept tears of relief as this woman expressed such compassion for herself and her own challenges. (Note: I recognize that some do not like the word “reactive” and actually, I don’t either, and use it here as a shorthand, to be discussed in greater depth on another day.) But by the time I took that seminar, I had spent dozens of hours receiving advice from professionals, both in person and online and in books, (though I hadn’t found O’Connell yet,) and this woman was the first time someone had empathized with my feelings of disappointment and sadness. The course leader had put this guest lecturer up first, demonstrating an understanding that before I could truly do my best for my dog, I must give weight to my own feelings as well. But it’s not only behavioral issues that challenge us. As I write this, Hayward, my black lab, has a growth right next to his brain. It’s called a “nerve sheath tumor” and it’s way too close to the brain to be operated on. All they can do is a short course of targeted radiation in hopes of slowing it down, but they can’t remove it. We did this treatment just over a year ago. Yesterday, Hayward had a follow up MRI. We drove for about an hour to the hospital, and I cooled my heels in a cute small town nearby, waiting to hear how it went. Finally, the vet called. “No perceptible change.” The tumor had not grown! Tears of joy wet my face and a swell of pride filled my chest. Pride? Yes, for Hayward. What a good boy! But sadly, we are on the topic of unfixable problems, and I must also share that the prognosis for this type of tumor, with treatment, is two years. That means, statistically, it is hard to type this, we are entering the last year of Hayward’s life. I am planning trips to the snow, lots of visits with his pitbull girlfriend, “Sushi,” and as many belly rubs as he can stand. We recently subscribed to a regular toy and treat box, so I won’t forget to give him new, weirder, squeakier toys and novel treats every single month, and I’m happy to have that reminder because like the hurried parents who rush past Gadget, sometimes I too deprioritize love. And that is my real point here. We all need reminding sometimes, that nothing is promised. This moment, here and now, with this particular pack, it’s all we’ve really got. And that’s OK. Because though it may seem that you got a dog to go running with, or to meet cute girls at the dog park, or to bark if a burglar breaks in, that isn’t the real story. You got a dog for one simple reason: because you needed someone to love. As the philosopher Seneca said at the end of his letters, “and now I will come to the point and pay you what I owe.” This is the inaugural column of what will be a ten-part series. I am calling it “The Imperfect Dog.” (I’m having a little fun there, because the Imperfect Dog can be called “The ID” for short, and in some ways, a dog can be this Freudian expression of our most animal impulses. The dog who humps pillows and slathers openly at the thought of a treat, and rolls in ecstasy on a pile of something smelly. We all wish we could be so uninhibited!) The Imperfect Dog will cover all the usual dog topics. You will learn my views on dog parks, whether you need to be more “alpha,” and lots of good tips not form me, but from the experts and wise dog people I will introduce you to. But my purpose will be singular. My angle, my slant, my pitch: until we get out of the business of insisting that life should be as we would have it, and not as it is, we will never know a moment’s peace. And the same goes for man and woman’s best friend. These so-called problems— the throw up on the carpet, the chewed table leg, the staunch refusal to come when called, not to mention reactivity and brain tumors— these are the very moments that will teach us the most about how to love. So here’s the question I promised at the beginning: do you really love your dog? Not tomorrow, not the next day, but right now? For myself, I don’t have the answer, but I find that remembering the importance of the question usually sends me in the right direction, for dog and human alike. P.s. one more thing about Hayward. After the vet yesterday, I made sure to have a toy waiting for him in the car afterwards, because even if he is groggy from anesthesia, Hayward likes to celebrate getting into the car with squeaking a toy in his mouth. We people may lose track of what really matters, but it isn’t only elephants. A dog never forgets. Thanks for reading. Please do share this column with friends, and please don’t pee on the carpet. Further resources:
Patricia O’Connell’s book, At the Other End of the Leash: Why We Do What We Do Around Dogs. Though it often shelved in the humor section, one of the most seriously useful dog books I have is a picture book by artist Lili Chin. Doggie Language: A Dog Lover’s Guide to Understanding Your Best Friend has wonderfully simple drawings to help you translate what your dog is feeling or thinking in any given moment. On a similar topic but handled very differently, On Talking Terms with Dogs: Calming Signals by Norwegian trainer Turid Rugaas explains further about understanding the meaning of various dog postures. A Holiday post from Christmas Past. Love and Peace to all. - Lisa Many people have a tradition this time of year to make a gratitude list. Around Thanksgiving and into the winter holidays, people reflect, and consider all they have to be grateful for. And this is a wonderful practice. I, like many, even went through a period when I kept a daily gratitude journal, jotting down what I was most grateful for every night before bed.
But this time of year also has a way of reminding us of winters past, and marking clearly in our minds what we have lost. Some people are facing their first holidays without a loved one who has died. Others must confront their first holiday after losing their houses to wildfires or natural disaster. Or their first holiday being divorced, broken-up, unemployed, ill, or alone. For many of us, among the losses this year has been the loss of a faith in government, or even a confidence in fundamental public decency. News from many parts of the world is deeply troubling, and for some a sense of certainty or hope has been lost. For many, it has been a rough, painful year. In this season of list making, I bristle a bit at the idea that a “best of” list has more value than a “worst of” list. More and more as life takes its toll, my idea of optimism is not to “focus on the positive”, but to love, as Zorba the Greek said, “the full catastrophe.” I think there is a way of looking at loss that can have almost the same result as a gratitude list. It’s a different route to the same destination. Here’s what I mean. One New Year’s Eve, I was performing in a musical show. Sitting in the dressing room as we applied our make-up, the actress next to me said, “I can’t wait for it to be next year.” “Why?” I asked. “Because,” she said, studying herself in the glass, “next year will not be the year I got divorced.” Some events are so challenging, they come to define us. There was before, and after, and we are forever changed. And sometimes, as the year wraps up, we feel as if we will drown in the choppy waves of that change. As with my stage colleague, we may not deny the fact of a horrible event, but we are ready to let go of who we were in the face of it. And there is truth in that. Whatever recovery is yet to come, whatever new trials and tribulations next year will bring, it will not be the year _________ happened. Sometimes, when tragedy strikes, you have to take it head on, and say look at that horrible, horrible thing that happened. You can’t not dwell on the horribleness of it. It was so, so, horrible, wasn’t it? And in that way, looking at loss can force you to come face to face with something no gratitude list can give you: a realization of your own strength. Because the more horrible the loss, the more strength you summoned. Your losses may have been horrible this year, unthinkable even. But if you’re reading this, you survived them. Yes, you did. And as we say in the theatre, bravo! This holiday won’t be the same as other years. It just won’t. Will it be happy? Sad? Tiring? Confusing, miraculous, or gratifying? All or none of the above? I suppose none of us knows. Whatever it will be, and whatever losses you are facing, I wish you well, for your first holiday without _____________. Love, Lisa Written in loving memory of my cousin, Greg Walsh, and my friend, Frank Poletti. 2017 was the year we lost them. I can set my watch by a neighbor of mine. Well in his eighties, he is a widowed man with a long white beard covering a John Muir-esque face. Winter or summer, he wears a wide-brimmed flattop hat. He walks slowly these days, using a cane, and every evening at the same time, presumably after dinner, he sets off down the hill. In winter, he carries a flashlight. He walks to the English style pub one block from our houses, where he meets a few men. They sit at the same corner table, and chat over beers for about two hours. My neighbor and his friends are harkening back to a German custom called “Stammtisch.” Pronounced Sh-tahm-tish. (The Germans like to mush words close together, like people on the UBahn.) This hybrid word means, quite literally, root-table, or regular’s table. Though it refers to the table itself, which was sometimes literally a round table with the large stump or root of a tree for a base, the idea of a Stammtisch is a regular gathering. A “Treffpunkt” (meeting place) for conversation. Originally, the table was reserved local dignitaries or politicians, to gather and play cards, or discuss philosophy, politics, or important topics of the day. If a stranger innocently wandered in and took a seat at the Stammtisch, he would be shooed away to another table. The Stammtisch was exclusive, only for men, and only those of a certain rank. There is a long tradition of the Stammtisch in Germany, some of it quite sinister. Encouraging conspiracy theories at these local gatherings played a role in the growth of fascism. But artistic Stammtische have also flourished, particularly in the early days of coffee’s popularity, and notably in Leipzig. Café Zimmermann in that city was host to the Collegium Musicum, a musical society founded by composer George Phillip Telemann, and many of Bach’s secular works, including the Coffee Cantata, had their debuts in that space. (An exception to the “no women in the coffee house” rule was made, so women were allowed to attend these performances.) Table at the Coffe Baum in Leipzig, where Robert and Clara Schumann celebrated their wedding. Café Zimmerman was destroyed by an air raid in ’43, but nearby still stands another of Bach’s haunts, the Coffe Baum. (The Coffee Tree.) One of the oldest coffee houses in Europe, it is just steps away from St. Thomas Church, where Bach spent most of his life and career. And after Bach’s time, it was the root table of two other great musicians, Clara and Robert Schumann. (The building is now a coffee museum which you can visit, and see the corner booth with dark wood paneling where the couple toasted their marriage.) Goethe, Liszt, and Mahler were but a few other luminaries who enjoyed the Coffee Tree. Along with the Schumanns and their friends, there are other famous Stammtische that are artistic, rather than political. A cadre of writers first gathered at the Algonquin Hotel for lunch to welcome Alexander Wolcott home from World War One, and continued the event which became the stuff of literary legend. More broadly, the word is often used to encourage gatherings, as when my German teacher invited her students to gather at the Junket, an authentic German deli that used to be in El Cerrito, just north of Berkeley. We would gather once a month to eat sauerkraut, drink beer, and practice our German. But I have also heard the word used in contemporary Germany simply to mean an individual’s regular spot. The restaurant you might drop into more or less daily for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. This is your Stammtisch. A restaurant in the Charlottenburg neighborhood of Berlin, on the corner of Pestalozzi Strasse and Krumme Strasse, was my Stammtisch. Café Feliz. Run by a husband and wife, a German woman and a Turkish man, it was often their daughter who waited on me. Like the American diner, Café Feliz was an all-purpose restaurant with a deliberately broad menu. I lived nearby, and might go for breakfast and have a “Spanische Frühstuck,” a Spanish breakfast, which was diced tomato in olive oil with herbs on toast. Or I might go for lunch and have a salad or omelet, or on a cold day a big plate of “Kartoffeln ohne Speck, bitte.” Potatoes without bacon, please. Later, I might go for dinner and have a Pizza Marguerita. And still later, close to midnight, I might pop in after attending the Deutsche Oper and have a Sambucca, handily lit on fire by the same waitress who made my morning coffee. The staff was always thin at Café Feliz, with one guy in the kitchen, helped by the husband and wife, and two waitresses, at most, for the large space which also had outside tables. It would never work in America, where people are in a hurry, and the Starbucks barista apologizes t if you have to wait thirty seconds before being asked for your order. But there it functioned perfectly. Twice a week the Platz opposite the restaurant had an open air market, and on those busy days you might wait ten minutes or more before anybody got around to you, which only helped you feel at your leisure. And while the service was excellent, it was not obsequious, which was also ideal for the Stammtisch feeling. Between mealtimes I could hog a table for hours, working on a novel. The family who ran the place would take time to chat with me during the lulls. I always felt welcome. I am not an intrepid traveler. I travel, but I am like the swimmer who doesn’t really like swimming, who rushes from buoy to float to shore. So finding a home base in a new city is important to me. And fortunately, I have found that Stammtisch feeling can happen in an instant, even when you’re not a local, much less a regular, and even if you visit the place only once. One rainy day near Paddington Station in London, I had an hour or so to kill before my train. I wandered around narrow, unpopulated streets until I found what I didn’t know I was looking for. My place. The entrance was about twice as wide as the door, and the whole long room was wide enough only for a counter and a man behind it moving sideways like an octopus on a wall of rocks, his arms everywhere, flipping sausages, pouring coffee, buttering toast. I squeezed onto a stool between two men tucked into full plates, their elbows on the counter, their faces— to this romantic American— Dickensian. I had an almost full English breakfast, that is eggs, beans, tomatoes, toast, but no meat. And a cup of coffee that was such a generic black liquid, it might’ve been coffee or strong English tea. It was perfect. I was fairly dressed up for the place, but still got nothing more than a fleeting sideways glance, and enjoyed my food and a sense of belonging until there was nothing but the shine of grease on the plate. When I’ve had more time in a place, I have cultivated a Stammtisch more deliberately. In Paris, there was a café near a bridge, quite picturesque, I went every day. One morning a photo shoot took place on the bridge, with a handsome male model seated on a vespa. Made to order with my croissant. A book café in Vilnius was dark and unpretentious. The woman behind the bar used her downtime to make tiny, hand-carved wooden earrings. I had some tomato soup from a can, and found a ragged old copy of a Sue Grafton mystery I had read before, because a book can also be a Stammtisch. When travelling, a temporary Stammtisch is a restorative. Before a day of newness, which may be hit or miss, one gains confidence that once a day, or twice, you’ll know what to expect. This is only natural. It’s what philosopher George Santayana once called “the instinct for self-repetition.” And its evolutionary. If our ancestors ate the berries of a certain bush, and were nourished and did not die, it only made sense to return safely to that same bush, rather than brave a different, unknown food source. But there’s another reason for this less adventuresome choice. You become at home in a public place, and become part of the wallpaper. You begin to feel like a local, or as if you are wearing Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak. Thus ensconced, you can truly observe. My nephew is a barista and coffee roaster in Los Angeles. He is also a writer and novelist. What a genius job for him to choose. He will never want for stories, even if he must fill in some of the details about the man with the friendly dog, or the woman who is always in a rush. Much of the lure of restaurant work is to be on the inside of the Stammtisch. To be a purveyor of that sought-after sense of belonging. And it’s always a thrill for the staff when a celebrity chooses the restaurant as his Stammtisch. Kurt Vonnegut used to write and drink coffee at an unassuming cafeteria-style lunch spot called Miss Brooks Restaurant at the corner of 53rd and Third Avenue in New York. As a writer, I couldn’t carry Kurt Vonnegut’s water, but working at Miss Brooks, I did pour his coffee. In my time waiting tables at Spring Street Natural, also in NYC, I waited on the comedienne Nora Dunn. Already a star on SNL, she came in during a quiet lunch shift and didn’t speak to me at all, but left me a five dollar tip on a seven dollar salad, a gesture that said, “the service was good, and I’ve been where you are.” But any regular becomes a celebrity to the staff and, in a certain way, beloved. Even the difficult ones give the crew something to talk about, to help pass the time. And the pleasant ones are nothing less than a treasure. There is no style on a Stammtisch. It may be casual and cozy, or elite and glamorous. The British or Irish Pub is more or less a guaranteed Stammtisch. My sister plays fiddle, and has her regular weekly musical gathering, but is also always on the lookout for a place to join in and play. The Jam Session is a musical Stammtsich. And I love to think about certain eras of the Stammtische, (the plural) like the Vesuvio Café in San Francisco’s North Beach, where the Beats hung out in the 50s, or in Broadway’s heyday, when Elaine’s and the Stage and Sardi’s would overflow with theatrical crowds, Al Hirschfeld at a corner table sketching his zigzagging lines. For a while, the coffee shop at the Edison Hotel on 47th Street was my Stammtisch. The Edison inspired Neil Simon’s 45 Seconds from Broadway, and was always a reliable place to spot stars and stage managers polishing off blintzes or matzoh ball soup before or after a show. But the character of a Stammtisch is not always social, or even fun. Dunn only came in the one time, but there was a regular at Spring Street Natural I will never forget. She was a young woman, still in her twenties. She always came in around dusk. She sat by the window, never ordered food, and had one glass of white wine which she lingered over, staring out the window for the better part of an hour, and then paying the bill in time to leave before the dinner rush began. “Her husband died,” my friend told me one night. A small man, this waiter had a musical accent and a gentle demeanor that inspired confidences and large tips from the customers. I almost gasped when he told me. She was so young! I had so many questions. How did her husband die? Did they used to come in together? Is this a pilgrimage? How does she fill the rest of her days, and nights? I never asked any of those questions. But I did try to bring a little more friendliness to the table on those nights when I was the one to pour her wine. Long, long ago, I had my first Stammtisch, though I didn’t know it at the time. Almost daily my high school friends and I would extend our lunch hour at a place on University Avenue called Au Coquelet, where we hogged a cluster of tables pushed together at the center of the room. I’m sure we felt very sophisticated, and just as sure we talked prattle, nursing our nascent coffee addictions and discovering the joys of a simple gateau Basque. Perhaps my all-time favorite Stammtisch was a place in the West Village called Sandolino’s. I discovered it my first year in New York, which was coincidentally my first year of adulthood. The menu was fairly typical of a New York diner, though they had a few more items that were part of the new health food. Unlike most diners, the ceilings were two stories high, and there were many climbing plants up in the rafters. The tables were not formica, but a golden wood. Something about the decor spelled California to me, and I felt immediately at home. When a friend from Berkeley visited me at school, I took him to Sandolino’s and felt proud to show him my place. When I got a new boyfriend, Sandolino’s was one of our first stops, and also a test. If he didn’t appreciate Sandolino’s, he obviously couldn’t appreciate me. (He did come to appreciate Sandolino’s, and we later married.) Years later we lived together right behind a family-run grocery store in Berkeley, ducking in the back to pick up a loaf of bread, or a bag of onions. A grocery story can also be a Stammtisch, even without the Tisch. The Edison’s coffee shop is now a restaurant. Strictly fine dining, no blintzes to be had. Sandolino’s closed a long time ago, so did Spring Street Natural. Café Feliz in Berlin seems not to have survived the Pandemic. And Au Coquelet is no more. But right now, I am blessed with several nice establishments nearby. The pub my neighbor enjoys has food designed to comfort, and an occasional trivia night or musical act. There’s also a rather snazzy pizzeria, and a hole-in-the-wall bakery. Like a lot of people, the housebound reality of the pandemic made me much more aware of the importance of the Stammtisch. As a single person working mostly from home, I cherish being greeted with familiarity when I stop in for a drink or a meal, or to pick up takeout. And even on the days I don’t stop in, a friendly wave from the woman behind the bakery counter as I walk by with my dogs can lift my morning spirits. I staunchly refuse to quote the theme song from Cheers, because at a Stammtisch, it doesn’t matter if everybody knows your name or not. You are the woman with the dogs, or the man who likes extra mustard. You are that important person, a regular. And on both sides, waiter and waitee, how pleasant or unpleasant we are in these seemingly transient relationships, well, it says a lot about a person. And word gets around. The next time you see Nora Dunn on TV, you might think of that big tip she left me. And did you know that my niece once waited on Meryl Streep? And she was just lovely! Though it started as a privilege for the town’s elite, the Stammtisch has also been an instrument of revolution, providing steam for the Reformation through seemingly innocuous societies like Telemann’s Collegium Musicum. Berkeley’s most famous chef, Alice Waters, encountered this revolutionary spirit the hard way when she announced she was closing César’s, a casual tapas bar next door to her famed restaurant, Chez Panisse. For twenty-four years, César’s had been enjoyed and beloved by both customer and staff, who had formed a social, commercial, and gastronomic bond so strong that it seemed an outrage that the actual owner of the property might want to do something else with the space. Signs and placards were colored in. Protests in the Berkeley tradition were held. César might’ve been Alice Water’s property, but now it had become something else. It had become a Stammtisch. I wasn’t a regular at César’s, but I do have an aspiration in the Stammtisch department. My image is based on someone I used to seat when I was a hostess at an Italian fine dining spot in Newton, Massachusetts. He was a slightly rumpled man. I imagined him having a difficult job, perhaps with numbers. He used to come in once a week, never wanting a table, always taking a seat at the bar, usually the noisiest least desirable one, right by the swinging door to the kitchen. He would order the fish, and have a second glass of wine but no dessert. He was always friendly and kind to the bartender, Tim, and to anyone else who happened to occupy the seat next to him. My goal is to be that kind of weekly regular, perhaps somewhere a bit fancy. I imagine I will gift myself that experience when I decide to consider myself a successful writer, which could be any day now. I will go religiously, once a week, probably on Thursdays. I’ll sit at the bar and have a particular drink, something people can recognize, and remember. Maybe the waitstaff, behind the kitchen door, will call me “Aperol Spritz.” “Aperol Spritz” is here again, they’ll say. “She looks happier this week, but she’s reading Tolstoy, isn’t that an odd combination?” That’ll give them something to talk about. Rosemary Kuhlmann as the Mother and Chet Allen as Amahl in the original 1951 production for television. (This article is mainly a roadmap for singers wishing to perform the aria, or for anyone interested in opera.) Should an aria from an opera written for television be performed in a way consistent with that medium, even if transported from screen to stage? Amahl and the Night Visitors, written and first broadcast in 1951, is the first ever opera commissioned for television and runs an appropriate 46 minutes. But composer Gian Carlo Menotti said he didn’t consider television at all. “All my operas are originally conceived for an ideal stage,” Menotti said, “which has no equivalent in reality.” But in the case of this aria, it doesn’t hurt to think small screen. Television is an intimate medium. Also, at this particular moment in the opera, all the other characters are asleep. The character of Amahl’s Mother is the only one awake, and we are let into her most intimate thoughts. It is a secret shared between character and audience. Mostly done at Christmas time, Amahl is a poignant tale for many reasons, but perhaps its most powerful essence is distilled in this moment of the Mother’s aria. The plot involves three Kings traveling to bring great gifts to a Messiah. (In the Italian Christmas tradition, “Three Kings Day” is celebrated on the Epiphany, twelve days after Christmas.) In a modest home, a poor woman cares for her child, Amahl, a bright, imaginative boy who is unable to walk without the use of his shepherd’s staff. (Think Tiny Tim goes East.) The aria asks many important questions about wealth, but it is not a merely philosophical exercise. Over the course of the aria, the Mother, through asking these questions, convinces herself that she has the right to steal some of the travelers’ gold for her the benefit of her child. The aria begins with the mother’s insomnia. As Stanislavsky taught, to play a murderer convincingly, one need only to have killed a mosquito. To understand the Mother’s plight, you need only have been kept awake by one unshakable thought, obsession, or addiction. To further appreciate the Mother’s difficulty, it is important to understand what it means to live in the grip of rural poverty. The totality of it. The isolation. How often does the woman see anyone other than poor villagers like herself, subsisting in the remote desert? Perhaps she, like all of us, has thought “what if?” What if she had been born a princess? What if her son could walk? What if she were not poor?” But in such a hard scrabble life, this woman is tired, and such thoughts require energy, and probably would only take her down deeper, into an even darker place. In some situations, hope is but a tease. No, this woman is not a dreamer. She leaves the land of make believe to her son. She never imagined such a moment would befall her, but it has. She has never had two coins to rub together, and suddenly there it is. “All that gold.” It must be a mesmerizing sight to her. Gian Carlo Menotti Edna Garabedian, a mezzo-soprano who worked closely with Menotti and once directed me, said that Menotti could take two hours to direct two measures of music. He was that specific. Staging-wise, you can’t move around much. Someone would wake up. Again to method acting, this is like the exercise of a “private moment.” You must learn to behave exactly as if you would in private. As if there is no audience. Dynamically, the aria begins and ends quietly. It is worth saying twice, it is an intimate piece. Whatever you do, pick a specific point of focus for that gold. That pile of gold that is keeping you awake. See it clearly, down left, or down right, or center, but don’t let it migrate. Menotti has written it low, escalating the pitch during what is a fevered dream of sorts, and then returning to the lower range to be quiet at the end, the way a dream sequence might be directed onstage, starting and ending in reality, but traveling in the imagination. Once you have established the privacy, you can fully inhabit the dream dynamically, but don’t do too much too soon, or you won’t take us with you. So we begin: All that gold…All that gold… The gold must pull you in. It must be strong desire. If you’re not feeling it, use a substitution. What do you want so badly you might do something terrible to get it? It is this desire that keeps her awake. The gold is calling to her. The first question: “I wonder if rich people know what to do with their gold.” We could spend a thousand words on this timeless paradox. Staying in the Christmas spirit, in Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life, a man shouts down at the young lovers, Jimmy Stewart and Donna Reed, “Youth is wasted on the wrong people!” Wealth is often wasted on the rich. And the idea of the undeserving rich is as fresh today as ever. The Mother’s subtext here: The rich don’tknow the value. It is her first justification. Before we go on, let’s talk about that gold. Specifically, let’s talk about the “G” in the word gold. Guh, guh, guh, a guttural sound that pulls the tongue into the back of the mouth. Not ideal for singing, right? So take care not to let the tongue get stuck there. And also, you sing the word like, a thousand times, and there’s a pile of gold right there onstage with you. Once that is established, the audience will do the work for you and hear the word gold, so you can get away with thinking of that “g” as more like a quick “c.” All that cold. All that cold. And really, make that “l” nice and quick as well, and no need to overdo the “d,” but if the “l” gets lost and the “d” gets a little breathy, you end up with all that “coat,” so don’t go too far. But especially as you go up and up and up, leave some of the “guh” behind. Speaking of range, is this an aria for mezzo or soprano? Menotti wrote the piece for mezzo-soprano Rosemary Kuhlmann, more on her in a bit, but the score reads simply, “soprano.” It is often done by both, and there are traps for each. The “high” note is not that high, I don’t have the score with me, but I think it’s a G, or no, A flat? Either one makes it suitable for dramatic soprano, mezzo, or even contralto. But for sopranos, the bulk of the piece lies in the lower register, and climbs upward, but then goes down again, so take care not to sing too heavily in the middle range, which will weaken the high note, nor to overdo the high note, which will cost you some of the bottom resonance you have to go back to. That was singer’s-speak for keep the voice balanced, but I hope it made sense. For mezzos, the caution would be more a matter of ego. A desire to show off too much of the rich creamy lower and middle range could cause you to be too sing-y, and ruin the mood, and as it is essentially a mood piece, not that tough to sing, you might sing it very well, but wouldn’t sell it if you over-sing. This is also one of those cases, as with Ulrica, that the quality of the high note is not really the point. Don’t tell your voice teacher I said so, but if the top not is a little shrieky, I don’t mind. The woman is desperate. And one musical note, consider the “all that” a two-noted appoggiatura. All that gold. You are constantly leaning in to the word “gold.” There is tremendous opportunity for accent and nuance with language throughout that can make or break the piece. Every word has a weight, a relative balance, with “gold” always having the most, well, value. Back to the question about rich people and their gold. There is a whole subset of questions to this. She sings: do they know that a house can be kept warm all day with burning logs? (Do they know?) Do they know how to roast sweet corn on the fire?...Do they know how to milk a clover fed goat? And a whole bunch of other things you have to get in the right order. Memorizing is fun! Picture each situation clearly, and always in order, a child can be fed, a house kept warm, sweet corn on the fire, a courtyard with doves, a clover fed goat, hot wine on cold winter nights. Again and again and again, which will only help the obsessiveness. And the “do they know?” interjected between each question shows the woman’s urgency. Is she asking God? Can he hear her? Will anyone answer? Hieronymous Bosch, The Adoration of the Magi It is a rhetorical question. Rich people have servants to put logs on the fire, and to spice the wine, so no, they don’t know. So the question behind the question here is, why did God give all the gold to the rich people, instead of to me and my needy son? We’ll get to that question a bit later. First, after the logs and the corn and the doves, the Mother returns to the lure of the gold, her obsession. It is a psychological leitmotif. All that gold. All that gold. Stronger every time she returns to it. (Some people say there are a lot of repetitions in Mozart, others say there are none, because you should never sing something the same way twice.) And now to the heart of the matter: “Oh, what I could do for my child with that gold!” And then another question. (Even with the rhetorical questions, make sure you really ask. She needs to go through these motions to justify stealing the gold. She has to put up a good fight within herself.) Now she asks, “Why should it all go to a child they don’t even know?” And quickly thereafter she observes, “they are asleep.” (Where onstage are they? Place them from the start, and to make things clear, put them on the opposite side from the gold. Gold downstage left, perhaps, people upstage right.) So, they are asleep. Now the final question, and really ask it, “Do I dare?” And the final rationalization, she’s gaining courage, steeling herself for the act. “If I take some, they’ll never miss it.” “For my child,” she repeats several times, reminding herself of the purity of her motive. And here you must include one gesture, the reaching out of your hand so that someone can grab your wrist and cry “thief” when the aria ends. But as for all those “for my child”s, I wouldn’t do any acting here at all. The relationship to the lyric and the meter is not exactly what you might think, and you need to count. “For my child,” -count beats- “for my child,” -count more beats- etc. The counting will give your face all the focus and concentration it needs. And you needn’t much voice. The fevered dream is over and you must ground us again in this intimate, made-for-TV moment. The others are asleep, you must now take action, for your child. Menotti, like other great composers, leaves a lot of clues in the music, text, and situation,. and I hope my thoughts are consistent with his intentions, but as always, these thoughts are offered only as food for thought, and to get your own creative juices flowing. Opera is art, not science, so take what you like here, and leave the rest. Your interpretation will be yours to discover. Some History about the Opera and the Singer: This opera came on the heels of Menotti’s The Consul, which ran on Broadway and won the Pulitzer the year before. It was commissioned by NBC in 1951. Way back in ’39, NBC also commissioned Menotti for the first opera written for radio, which was to be The Old Maid and the Thief. Imagine the excitement mounting for this first-ever TV opera, especially as Menotti, a notorious procrastinator, delayed and delayed. Fortunately, his procrastinations took him to the Metropolitan Museum of art, where reportedly he saw Hieronymous Bosch’s painting The Adoration of the Magi, and got inspired. The performance was given on Christmas Eve, with the NBC Symphony’s conductor, Arturo Toscanini, at the podium. The role of the Mother was originated by mezzo-soprano Rosemary Kuhlmann. A native New Yorker, Kuhlmann was 29 at the time of the first broadcast. Born in 1922, she was just in her early twenties during WWII when she joined the WAVES, studied Morse code, and sent secret messages. After the war, she went to Juilliard as part of the GI bill. Not much of a fan of opera, she was singing with the Robert Shaw Chorale when an audition to take over the role of the Secretary in the Broadway production of The Consul came up. She got the role, and later auditioned for Menotti for the role in Amahl. For the audition she sang Voi lo Sapete, the mother’s aria from Cavalleria Rusticana, it is a dramatic aria that builds from the bottom, similarly to All That Gold. According to Kuhlmann, Menotti said, “you’re a little young, but we’ll make you look like a biblical woman." Later, he called to ask her, “what’s your good high note?” To which she replied, an A, which he made the high note for the Mother’s quartet with the kings. After Amahl she had other operatic successes, notably taking on the major role of Magda Sorel in the Consul, singing with New York City Opera, and continuing to play the Mother in the annual televised performances of Amahl for a decade or so. She retired to raise a family, and later worked as an executive assistant to a VP at Pepsi. Rosemary Kuhlmann died in 2019 at the age of 97. Because of her service in the war, she was buried with military honors. Among her cherished memories must have been the moment after the broadcast in ’51, when she walked into Rockefeller Center’s iconic supper club, the Rainbow Room, and received a standing ovation. See Rosemary Kuhlman in the Original Staging of the Aria Below Gentlemen, Leave Your Swords at Home! Five Fun (and not so fun) Facts About Handel’s Messiah12/8/2023
1. Handel’s Messiah is the only piece of classical music that is routinely turned over to the audience. The history of the Sing-along Messiah, also known as a “Scratch Messiah” and a “Messiah Sing,” is a bit difficult to pin down. Since its premier in April, yes April, in 1742, productions of the English language oratorio for soloists, chorus, and orchestra have taken all shapes and sizes. The Great Handel Festival of 1857 sported a chorus of thousands. (725 sopranos, 719 altos, 659 tenors, and 662 basses.) Held at the Crystal Palace, an enormous cast iron and plate glass structure with an organ of more than 4,000 pipes, it’s a wonder none of the glass shattered from the high notes. I do question whether the nearly four thousand Handel Festival singers were all “professionals” by a verifiable standard. As a business proposition, maybe some were paid in beer, so perhaps that should be counted as the first sing-along. In the States, the singalong seems to have gotten going in earnest in the 1960s. Named like the popular protest “Sit Ins” of the day, the National Chorale claims its Messiah “Sing-in” is the longest running in the country. Now in its 56th year, they will perform this year at Lincoln Center’s newly restored David Geffen Hall. 2. Some of the text of Handel’s masterwork is antisemitism at its most pure and unapologetic. We love the uplifting message of Messiah. Humanity shall be saved! But what do we need saving from? You guessed it, the Jews. The scholarship of Michael Marissen, author of Tainted Glory in Handel’s Messiah, leaves little room for doubt that the libretto, adapted by Charles Jennens from biblical passages, is intended as a call to action, that so-called heathen nations must be vanquished. Another author on the subject, Robert J. Elisberg, imagines librettist Jennens in hell, enduring a frustrated eternity because his alarmist message has morphed in to a yearly, all-inclusive love-fest. As a Messiah veteran and a Jewish singer who has sung professionally in churches from Catholic to Christian Science, I know from personal experience that one must always take religious lyrics with a healthy grain of kosher salt. You have to do some substitution to sing “How Beautiful are the Feet?” convincingly. But there’s really no question that the glorious unity of old was at the expense of the perceived villainous Hebrew race. A poignant fact for today, though it cannot, as with Wagner’s personal and thematic antisemitism, nullify the power of the music. (Thank heaven for small mercies.) But yes, as satirical songster Tom Lehrer might have put it: Fa la la la la, “and everybody hates the Jews.” If you find this line of inquiry distressing you are not alone. After finishing his book, Marissen said he needed to take a break from religious topics, and would begin work on a general reader’s introduction to Bach. And if you are still upset, I can’t do better than to quote the title of Elisberg’s article: You Can’t Handel the Truth. Susanna Cibber 3. Contralto Susanna Cibber’s story is one of redemption and greatness. The sister of composer Thomas Arne, Cibber was admired by Handel and others for a rich and agile voice, but in 1741 she was in the throes of a PR problem. Having left an abusive husband to have children with another man, her husband sued. But as the husband in question seems to have only been after his wife’s money (a story sadly repeated in the lives of many great singers across history) sympathy for the “wronged” man was limited. Handel’s casting of Cibber as alto soloist for the premier performance of Messiah, which took place in Dublin, seemed to secure her redemption. The poignance of her singing in the great lament, He Was Despised, is said to have moved the chancellor of St. Patrick’s cathedral to declare all Cibber’s sins forgiven. The English theater owes Handel a great debt for bringing Cibber back into the fold. After Messiah, Cibber returned to London, where she became one of the greatest tragedians of the day, gracing the Drury Lane boards as leading lady opposite David Garrick. 4. The Messiah premier marked a turning point for the better in Handel’s troubled career. In 1741, Handel was having a tough time of it. Treading water if not drowning in debt, he was also recovering from a stroke, and his operas were failing to meet the changing tastes of London audiences. He took the text provided by Charles Jennens, and holed himself up for twenty-four days and wrote Messiah. Hoping for a change of luck, he welcomed an invitation from the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland to perform a series of concerts in Dublin. Messiah was an add-on, squeezed in between those other concerts. As rehearsals opened to the public, interest grew. Perhaps because there was not much going on the Dublin stage during Lent, and perhaps because many wanted to get a look at the notorious Susanna Cibber, a large crowd was anticipated. To make room for the crowds, women were asked not to wear their hoop skirts, and the gentlemen were asked to leave their swords at home. The space, with capacity for 600, squeezed in 700 Dubliners. Despite his own travails, or perhaps because of them, Handel cared deeply about those living in poor health and poverty, and the performance was held to benefit three charities. The prison debtor’s relief, a hospital, and an infirmary. Many were thrilled by Messiah’s success, but perhaps none more so than the 142 men freed from debtor’s prison by the proceeds. A repeat performance in June was offered for Handel’s benefit, and as a farewell to the composer before his final return to London. When he died, Handel left what had by then become a great fortune to charity. Since 1992, every April 13th on Dublin’s Fishamble Street, an open air performance of Messiah takes place to commemorate the premier of this great work, and the city’s place in musical history. The Roches 5. People of a certain age learned Messiah’s Hallelujah Chorus from a trio of sisters called the Roches. Their eponymous album was played incessantly in our household, with wonderful tunes delivered in steely-voiced three-part harmony. The sisters’ rendition of Hallelujah Chorus made a smash on Saturday Night Live in 1979. There have been many exquisite versions of this chorus, and there are many more to come, but to this author none could better the taut, sincere, and utterly musical rendition of those three women. One of its most distinctive features is the tune up, three notes sung on “ah” as the sisters adjust their harmony. A Handelian anecdote: one day many years ago, my then-husband and I happened to be in North Hampton, Massachusetts, (also the home of a long-running Messiah Sing.) We were walking down the main street past a small nightclub in the middle of the afternoon when we heard those unmistakable three notes ring out. “Ah!” “Ah!” “Ah!” It was like a divine visitation, a moment of musical history stepping out of time and falling upon our ears through the open door of the small venue. We stopped and looked at the poster advertising the act performing that night. Yes. We’d just heard the Roches doing their sound check. I’ve been soloist for a few Messiahs in my day and it is an odd experience, but delightful, when the audience suddenly stands up and joins in. In one local Messiah I did, at Unitarian Universalist Church of Berkeley, we all wore period costume, with Conductor Brian Baker looking quite a lot like Mozart in his white wig and satin britches. Like choruses around the country, UUCB’s Messiah Sing will be held this year. The tradition goes on. Some links for those with further interest: My interview with conductor and Handel expert Jeffrey Thomas Here. The Roches sing Hallelujah on SNL Here. A wonderful five-minute documentary on the scandalous contralto Here. In 1989 I was working at a bookstore in San Francisco when a slim volume of homespun philosophy hit the shelves. All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten by Robert Fulghum jumped rather than climbed onto the best seller list, where it remained for more than a year. The collection of brief essays suggested that we would all be better off if we remembered the lessons of childhood: share everything, don’t hit, clean up your mess. And every day be sure to sing, dance, paint something, and take a nap. At the time I had no use for that book, nor anything like it. The ordinary did not interest me. I felt myself on the verge of an extraordinary life. But the popularity of the book provided diversion to the bookstore staff. Perched on a walled platform in the center of the store, we quite literally looked down upon the well-dressed visitors who came in to browse before the opera, and the locals who came in search of the latest thriller or literary prize winner. Every bookseller knows the feeling of trying to help a person who knows exactly the book they want, they just don’t happen to know the title, or the author. In those pre-digital days, we flipped through slippery pages and scanned the lilliputian typeface of an enormous volume called simply, Books in Print, to try and help them find what they wanted. For an entire year people came in asking for Fulghum’s book. The problem was the name. People couldn’t get it right. “There’s a book about kindergarten,” they’d say. Or, “I’m looking for a book called, ‘Everything I Really Want I Already Had But Didn’t Know It.’” And we would try not to laugh, until one day we completely lost it when a woman came in and demanded a copy of that popular book, “you know, the one about the first grade!” Fortunately, my disdain for little books of wisdom like Fulghum’s did not survive. At various times since, I have fallen in love with many books one might loosely categorize as Spiritual Self-Help. The Four Agreements. The Seven Laws of Spiritual Success. Authors like Wayne Dyer and Eckhart Tolle. When I divorced, a little book called How to Survive the Loss of a Love offered granular advice on self-care that got me through some very tough days. But for a time I still resisted the mother-of-them-all. Chicken Soup for the Soul. I had read something about a shady marketing plan that moved the book to best seller status, and I decided (without reading a word of the book) that it was not for me. Then I decided to move to Berlin. My brother came to bid me goodbye at the airport and gave me a tattered copy of, you guessed it, Chicken Soup for the Soul. I took it with me. Not to read, but as a symbol of my brother’s love. About six months later, the moment came. I don’t remember what happened that day. Another audition, another rejection, perhaps. An unwelcome longing for the boyfriend I’d left behind. I don’t know. But something inspired me to pick up that book. I sat on the floor under ceiling-high windows, the half-hearted Berlin winter sunlight falling on the page as I read story after story, tears streaming down my face. I loved it. And I’m not alone. The Chicken Soup franchise is thriving. Thanks to my sister, I now have a copy of Chicken Soup for the Sister’s Soul. And those who know me will not be surprised to learn I also own Chicken Soup for the Dog Lover’s Soul. They may be the airplane reading of the spiritual liturgy, but I have come to cherish the kind of books I once dismissed, and I will always make room for them on my bookshelf. The year Fulghum’s book came out, cable news was taking root. CNN’s coverage of the fall of the Berlin Wall ushered in the 24/7 News cycle, and the digital information superhighway that would change our lives forever was being constructed. In Kindergarten, Fulghum compares the feeling of consuming too much “high-content information,” to the shuttering of his old car’s engine after being given a high octane fuel. He said it gave him the “existential willies.” These days, many of us have the existential willies. We read, watch, and scroll a lot. We are less in danger of being uniformed than we are of losing ourselves in chaos and misinformation. Jack Kornfield, the author of another gem of a book, After the Ecstasy, the Laundry, used to give a talk every Monday night at a meditation center in West Marin. Many Mondays I made the drive to hear him. Though his talks were profound, and for me often revelatory, he usually began by reminding the hundred or so of us who had gathered, that he wasn’t going to tell us anything we didn’t already know. His talks, like Fulghum’s book and the Chicken Soup stories, are not diatribes. They are gentle reminders. They bring us back to ourselves, sometimes after a long, unconscious hiatus. When we hear their words, we pause. We feel seen, because for a moment, in the midst of life, we see ourselves. Those moments can last a lifetime. My parents, who are almost ninety, still talk about a book from the 50’s called, The Lonely Crowd. It helped them to frame and understand their experiences coming of age in mid-century America. From Montaigne to The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck, books and blogs on how to live a better life come and go. Some are remembered, some forgotten. But for someone, somewhere, they provided the right idea, in the right way, at just the right time. A House in the Marina District At 5:04 p.m. on October 17th, 1989, I was at work, standing in the center of a bookstore called A Clean Well-Lighted Place for Books. The name was a quote from Hemingway, but that didn’t stop customers from correcting the grammar almost daily. “It should be a clean well litplace for books,” they would say with a disapproving smirk as I rang up their purchases at the cash register. Six years before Amazon began its selling books online, and well before internet omnipresence, being a bookstore clerk made me a kind of semi-deity. Someone who could open the gi-normous tomb ofBooks in Printand leaf through its onion skin pages to obtain information on a precious, hard to find volume. I loved that job. My coworkers were smart and funny, but with a veneer of cynicism that was only a pose, overlain atop a sweet vulnerability. Or perhaps I only saw it that way. I was a newlywed. Late that August I’d said my vows. I was also a budding opera singer working a stone’s throw from the greatest opera house in the world. I’d say I was rather aglow with love in all directions. The Bay Bridge When the quake came our customers did something astounding. They ran out of the store, straight into the traffic of Van Ness Avenue. Cars came skidding to a stop and people jumped back onto the sidewalk in relief and embarrassment. Perhaps they didn’t know that we stood on bedrock, a pretty good place to be at a time of seismic catastrophe. And they probably did not know that the owners of the store, in their infinite wisdom, had built all the shelves at a slight declining angle into the wall. When the shaking stopped, not a single book had fallen. I don’t remember if we closed or if I finished out my shift, but about an hour after the quake I headed home, walking along Van Ness in the growing dusk. This was the days before cell phones, and the chatter among people was constant, and rife with rumors and hubbub. The bridge collapsedwas something I heard and discounted. It was not possible, or so I thought. A few blocks west, a man with a shopping cart full of his possessions had a transistor radio, and a couple of people were huddled around it, listening to the news. A man in an expensive suit. A woman with a small child. I joined them. We listened together for some time. KGO, as always, was the voice of reason, calm, and solid information. Yes, in fact, part of the bridge had fallen. It was a strange, but quite beautiful moment of community, the cluster of us. I stepped away and continued up Van Ness. It was now almost dark, but many of the lights were out so it was darker than San Francisco usually is at that hour. The adrenalin began to be reabsorbed into my body as I walked faster. My brow furrowed against the strangely warm air as I began to realize this was much more than a hiccup. My ignorance swept over me. My husband was at a baseball game. The World Series. He, my brother, and my brother-in-law were all there. They’d been thrilled to go, even though the seats were fairly high up in the stands. I pictured the rough old concrete of Candlestick Park which seemed to wobble even in a stiff wind. Would it survive? The rest of my walk was a worried blur. I arrived home at our apartment on Clay Street between Larkin and Hyde. I went straight in and found our cat, Boomer, scared out of his wits, but just fine. A bookshelf had emptied but the apartment looked fine otherwise. I called my sister in the east bay. She was seven months pregnant, and fine. Mom was fine. Dad was fine. Everybody was fine. She and I speculated about what our husbands would do. She said news was coming in of traffic ground to a halt because of a collapse of the Nimitz freeway. The casualties would turn out to be in the dozens. I thought, I hoped, my husband, brother, and brother-in-law would make their way to me, but how would they get here? Were the busses running? I grabbed a pack of cigarettes – yes, opera singers smoke sometimes, especially when there are earthquakes – and headed down to the street, where I smoked and chatted with my neighbors. After several hours my husband arrived home. I will never forget the look on my brother-in-law’s face before I had the chance to tell him that my sister, his wife, was fine. It is the only time I have ever seen him scared. I tried to convince my brother and brother-in-law to stay with us. The world seemed a scary place and I was glad to have them back in my circle. But they decided to make their way across the Bay. The Cypress Freeway after Collapse The power was out in our little apartment, and would stay out for days due to damaged substations. That part of San Francisco is just at the bottom of the ritzy Nob Hill, but truly it is closer to the Tenderloin, which is why it is jokingly called “the Tender Nob.” Feathers were ruffled over the coming days as power went back on in the wealthier neighborhoods first, but we waited, and waited. The Tenderloin’s power came on last. Eventually I went back to work. Those days I had the duty of ordering the books for opera and music section, an honor I abused terribly, ordering every book I was interested in until finally they took the assignment from me. That era was a pinnacle of glory for the opera. The season before I had heard La Bohème with none other than Luciano Pavarotti and Mirella Freni, a performance so convincing and impeccable it caused me never again to lament casting grand sized opera singers in the role of young lovers. A month before the quake I had seen the great Jessye Norman in recital, and the season had opened with a sexy, smashing Luluand Sam Ramey at the peak of his voice as Mefistofeles. In general the San Francisco Opera in late eighties offered a series of performances I feel proud and lucky to have beheld, very often grabbing a sandwich after work at the bookstore, and spending the evening leaning on the rail behind the orchestra section flanked by my fellow standees. The performance scheduled for the night of the Quake was cancelled. Subsequent performances took place at the Masonic Auditorium and later the Civic Center as a substantial repairs and seismic retrofit were performed on the War Memorial Opera House, a place many in the city and music-loving community of the Bay Area consider almost a person, at least a friend. But opera fans put up with the inconvenice, and the cavernous acoustics elsewhere. Even later, back at the opera house, most of us took a moment before the curtain rose to look up at the tight meshed net that seemed to defy the gravity of the crumbled ceiling. But like the city in 1906, San Francisco Opera showed itself to be the comeback King. The actual tragedies touched me only peripherally. When I went to my Italian lesson the day after the Quake, my teacher was in tears. His friend had been one of those who died in the Marina, a neighborhood built on landfill that had fared quite poorly. A good friend from high school had exited the Nimitz freeway less than a minute before it collapsed. But the worst had been spared to those closest to me and I felt that mixture of relief and guilt common to all survivors. Two years later, when a firestorm engulfed the Oakland Hills, I was living on the East Coast. At first I paid small attention to the news of “a fire in California.” It’s a big state, it could’ve been anywhere. Then I realized it was directly above my parents’ home and I watched the news in horror. In the end, my parents’ home was just below the evacuation line, and though my brother had hosed down the roof and they had stood and watched the hillside burn, they were safe, as was the grand lady of the Claremont Hotel, a landmark most of us East Bay natives consider iconic. Since then, disaster has become more common, and more personal. Two years ago, in the weeks following fires here, we suffered a noxious and oppressive air quality for days, and shortly following that my cousin, young, healthy, and in his early forties, died suddenly of a heart problem. He was not technically a victim of the fire, but in my mind the events are forever linked. And I have two friends who lost everything to fire, or rather almost everything. They left with the clothes on their back, and their dogs. Their strength in the aftermath has amazed me. I don’t pity them, because I have seen them triumph. The months following the Quake, the book Fifteen Seconds positively flew off the shelf in the bookstore. A hastily published paperback coffee table book, it encapsulated the worst events of the Quake, and it was one of those times in the bookstore trade that one book absolutely took over a section of the industry. When that book came out, I’d say all of San Francisco wanted a copy. And I can understand why. The mind needs help after an event like that. It seems almost unreal. Looking at those pictures, of fallen buildings, of people gathered, it lets you know, yes, this happened. But unlike the scrolling infinity of misery we all see every day on our phones, that book was finite. A frightening, tragic encapsulation that you could pick up when you needed to consider what had happened, but was also comforting because you could finish it, and put it down. CNN was founded in 1980, so it was up and running for the evens of ’89, and ’91. But the world’s population had not yet jumped aboard the 24/7 news cycle, nor did we all have cell phones, creating our own, more intimate version of 24/7. So there was a way in which these catastrophes trickled in, just as I waited in the darkened apartment for news of my husband, families waited, communities waited, cities waited. And it was in that window of not knowing that barriers came down. The number of homeless individuals in San Francisco has reached huge proportions lately, but it is far from a new problem. And people interact with each other in different ways about that. Some stop, to offer solace, or money. And sometimes a person asks for money. But when was the last time you stopped a homeless person to ask for a favor? In that moment on Van Ness, the man with the shopping cart was our lifeline for a few moments, and in those few moments our “status”, if you will, was reversed. That, I think, is the great gift of these catastrophes. Things that are artificial, or unimportant, disappear. My family is different now, since we lost our cousin. And even these larger catastrophic events, (among which many of my friends and family include a frightening and tyrannical presidency,) these things have the ability to shake us out of our routines, to make us feel an existential human fear, not only for ourselves, but for our loved ones. I will never forget that look on my brother-in-law’s face. At least I hope I never will. Because it reminds me of the truth: we are all of us hanging by the thinnest of threads. Once we know that, or remember it, the only option is to be as kind and as helpful as we possibly can. Maryann Magnin, photo used with permission from the American Jewish Historical Society For Carol Travel with me back in time. It’s 1976. A Saturday morning, early. I’m in the back seat of a Ford Country Squire Station Wagon that has a wood-paneled exterior and more steel than a fleet of Priuses. Mom is at the wheel. Riding shotgun is my older sister. At sixteen, she is the most glamorous person I know. I’m in the backseat, leaning forward so I can arrive just a split second sooner. We’re going to the City. Better than that, we’re going to Magnin’s. To say that I. Magnin and Company represents old California would be an understatement. In 1876 Dutch-born Maryann Magnin, the daughter of a rabbi, immigrated to Oakland and began selling high-end baby clothes. The “I” was for Isaac, her husband. As the business expanded, the locations improved. The building we’re headed to is on Union Square. Ten stories of white marble built in 1948, a time when the department store stood as a gleaming palace on the hill of the American psyche, a repository for postwar plenty and a conduit for the magic of modernity. It was a time when families all over the country loaded themselves into big cars like ours and sailed downtown to buy a belt, a sofa, or a set of tools. For people in the Bay Area, it was Sears. The Emporium. Capwell’s. Bullock’s. For the women of my family, the biannual sales at I. Magnin’s were a pilgrimage of the highest order, for the lowest prices. A time to claim our rightful inheritances as Queens of Frugality. Unlike today, when this season’s clothes disappear magically from store shelves, making their way to secondary retail houses like Ross, or TJ Maxx, in those days many stores cleared their own inventory, creating deep-cut annual sales like the one at Magnin’s, or places like Capwell’s Basement, with its large tables piled high in pants, bras, dresses. Tables you could stand at for hours, moving your arms through the clothing like a gold miner, elbow-deep in the river, searching for treasure. Arriving in the City for the Magnin’s sale, we thread the long body of the Country Squire around the tight spiral ramps of the newly expanded parking garage at Sutter and Stockton, and then walk through Union Square, heads held high as we march right past Macy’s (and it’s full retail prices.) Arriving at Magnin’s, we grasp the ornate brass door handles, still cold to the touch from the San Francisco fog, and step inside, immediately enveloped by a sense of richness. The large, two-story room glows from Lalique light fixtures hanging in a golden ceiling. Powdery floral breezes waft over towards us from the cosmetics in the Mural Room with its stained glass by French artist Max Ingrand,whose work can be seen in other obscure places, like Notre Dame. Not to be distracted, we head straight to the elevators, Mom setting a fast pace as if leading us into battle, and up we go, our stomachs doing a little flip as we ascend, anticipating the glorious things we will find. I am about to sound like an old lady, but I don’t think I own one piece of clothing today that is as well-made as the things we used to buy at Magnin’s. Wool skirts with real linings, pants and shirts that lasted for years, and years. And the prices were astonishing, so we bought plenty. Walking back to the car, our arms grow longer from carrying heavy bags, and again we walk quickly, like bank robbers, hurrying from the scene of the crime. Loehmann’s was another Mecca for us. In 1921, Frieda Loehmann put her knowledge as a department store buyer to use, acquiring the season’s designer overstock for a pittance and selling it at a bargain. The idea took off and Loehmann’s became a chain. (And a concept, later copied by many.) Mom had grown up going to Loehmann’s in New York, so when my sister and I went with her and Grandma, it was a tradition continued, a touch of old New York right there in the East Bay. One time I snapped a picture as Mom and Grandma walked in. I wanted to capture that moment, their backs slightly hunched as they lurched forward, purses clasped tightly under their arms. I felt I was witnessing a vestige of ghetto life, a time when Jews had to be savvy, to scrounge and forage to survive. There’s nothing to match the focus and intensity of mothers and daughters on a trip to Loehmann’s. When I was sixteen I read Lauren Bacall’s autobiography, and she described just such a scene with her mother at the original Loehmann’s, in a former auto showroom in Brooklyn. And that’s how I felt. When I went to Loehmann’s, I was connected to a great lineage of women in pursuit of fashion. I was a New Yorker. I was Lauren Bacall. Loehmann’s had much to recommend it, with its tantalizing, slightly illicit-sounding “Back Room” for designer fashion. But my favorite thing about Loehmann’s was the communal dressing room. Mirrors all around, no limit to the number of items you could bring in, beyond what you could manage to carry in your arms. Everybody half-naked, and free to comment on anything they liked. “You’re not getting that? I’ll try it!” someone would say, grabbing my reject from the rack in the middle of the large space. “What a figure!” the old lady next to mom might say, pointing to me, and I would blush as the other women nodded, feeling like I had a dozen kind grandmas. I’m not alone. Loehmann’s dressing room is immortalized in an etching with hand coloring by artist Helen Frank. And Erma Bombeck, a humorist I used to think was corny, but now seems increasingly wise, once titled one of her books, “All I Learned About Animal Behavior I Learned in Loehmann’s Dressing Room.” Of course, shopping wasn’t just about clothes. On most every Saturday morning my siblings and I woke to the blaring horn of the station wagon, signaling us to get out of bed and come unload the haul of goods (and not-so-goods) mom had acquired in her garage sale-ing. But sometimes Mom paid full price. When Mom and Dad had a party, we always made a trip to the Genoa delicatessen in Oakland, back when it was a postage stamp-sized shop where we would crowd in shoulder-to-shoulder and pick a number. Mom would buy sliced salami, and ravioli. For Dad, a love of shopping was all about books. Once, during the turbulent sixties, Dad was browsing at a bookstore on Telegraph Avenue while the rest of us were waiting in the car. Mom, me, my brother, and my sister. Waiting. And waiting. It was one of those times as a kid when life gets very vivid all of a sudden. Mom was fuming. I could almost see the steam coming out of her ears. Suddenly there was a huge crash above us. Someone had thrown a gigantic pumpkin from an apartment above, and it landed square on the roof of our car. Perhaps our station wagon was a symbol of the bourgeoiserie, and they were making a statement. Perhaps they were on LSD, and thought the pumpkin was a bomb that needed to be gotten rid of. Either way it was the last straw for Mom. With three frightened children, the wet flesh of the pumpkin-goo pouring down the windows around us, she ordered my big sister to go in and get Dad, which she did, dragging him away from the books like an alcoholic from the bar. Telegraph Avenue is different these days. The flagship of revolutionary cafés, Café Mediterranean, also known as “the Med”, is recently closed. Meanwhile, the Genoa has one location left, not the original. Loehmann’s went bankrupt. I didn’t know it at the time, but even before they moved into the “White Marble Palace”, as Christian Dior called it, I. Magnin’s had been sold to the Bullock’s chain, and by the time I was shopping there the two had merged to become “Federated Department Stores.” Later the Magnin’s and Bullock’s brands were bought out by Macy’s, before disappearing entirely after a “realignment.” Until recently, though, one could still use the sixth floor restroom. Made of green marble, fit for royalty, it had become part of Macy’s. But the building recently changed hands again, so that, too, is ended. And so it goes. These days my shopping patterns are varied. I have my favorite local shops, many of which seem to close too soon, but I’ll admit to ordering frequently online, and shopping at large discount stores. I’d like to say that every time I do, I wonder what beloved local business I am helping to kill, but I don’t. That would be too exhausting. Mostly, I appreciate the time and money saved. Still, I think about it. Where that bookstore on Telegraph stood, just a few doors down from the old Café Med, is a gleaming new café. It has tall windows and stark black tables that no one will ever carve their names into, and around which no revolutions will be planned. I drive by one evening and see the students, each illuminated in the solitary glow of their laptops. I feel the urge to stop. To go in and tell them that this once was a bookstore, and that someone smashed a pumpkin on the roof of our car. I want to tell them about Loehmann’s, and Magnin’s, and the Genoa, too. I want to ask them, and myself, and all of us, what are we doing? Fortunately, Magnin’s lives on in other ways. The company grew deep roots in California, and San Francisco in particular. Joseph, one of Maryann and Isaac’s eight children, founded his own clothing company, which was run by his son, Cyril Magnin, and Cyril’s philanthropy is legendary in the City. He helped to establish the Asian Art Museum, American Conservatory Theater, and was a staunch supporter of the opera and other artistic institutions, earning him the moniker “Mr. San Francisco” from none other than Herb Caen, the beloved columnist who would’ve been well within his rights to claim the title for himself. You can never go home again, so they say. But I miss Herb Caen. And I miss those sales at Magnin’s. The rest of the year Magnin’s belonged to socialites and wealth-mongers, the crème de la crème. But twice a year, it was ours. It’s hard to put your finger on what’s missing from shopping these days. But I guess for me it’s the ride home. Mom is at the wheel. My sister still gets the front seat, and I’m in the back. But now I’m not leaning forward. I’m resting deeply into that giant Country Squire seat, lightheaded, and exhausted, surrounded by bags. Classy bags made of thick, stiff paper, with silk rope handles and embossed lettering that reads, “I. Magnin and Co.” P.S. In researching this article, I found my way to various I. Magnin images and memorabilia, one of which was the dress below, which I bought on Ebay. What a steal! *Helen Frank print used by permission of Lafayette College, Helen Frank Master Print Collection, 1949-2014. Special Collections & College Archives, David Bishop Skillman Library, Lafayette College. Special thanks to Elaine Stober, college archivist, and also to Melanie Meyers, Director of Collections at the American Jewish Historical Society for allowing the use of the picture of Mrs. Magnin. I don’t know about you, but I was pretty self-centered in my twenties. Adulthood was just getting started, I had things to do, places to go. At least compared with how I feel now, I didn’t have too much imagination about how others really felt. And even now, I’m guilty of taking people for granted, loving them, but not always taking time to really appreciate them. I think I’m actually better at loving dogs than I am loving people. At least, I seem to have a more accurate sense of what they need and want, and also seem to have an almost infinite supply of patience and love when it comes to my four footed friends. So when my beautiful German Shepherd passed away suddenly, three months ago, I was devastated, of course. But I knew that I had filled her life to the brim with happy dog days. She played, she frolicked, she ate treats, she got belly rubs. All the time. Every day. And that’s a comfort to me, now that she’s gone. I can’t exactly say the same for the sudden loss of my cousin, Greg, this past October. Of course I loved him, of course I thought about what a great guy he was, and was always thrilled to see him and catch up. But it wasn’t until he was gone that I really began to appreciate who he was. A lot of that came from seeing him through the broader lens of the love of his family and friends. His coworkers, his Hootenanny partners, his fellow Ducks fans. In some ways, it wasn’t only that I got more information about Greg, more data, but that because of the loss, I took the time (or the time took me) to reflect more deeply. One of the things I’ve been thinking about a lot since October, is Greg’s platter. I’d say we give pretty nice Christmas gifts in our family. But except for the kids, we mostly try to keep it modest. Scarves and best sellers, a big box of juice oranges. Those are pretty much the norm. And then one Christmas, about twenty years ago, there was the platter. Greg handed me a heavy package, and I couldn’t imagine what it was. When I opened it, I was somewhat stunned at what a special, lovely gift he had given me. I don’t remember what I said when I unwrapped it. But I do remember what Greg said. He said that he had been at a crafts fair, and when he saw it, he immediately thought of me, and how creative I was. “I just thought you would like it,” he said. He was right. I like it. And I’ve liked it for twenty years. For a while I kept onions on it, then it was for my snacks hodgepodge. When I did a photo shoot for a column on veganism, I dusted it off and loaded it with pretty vegetables. And other times it was tucked away in a cabinet. But it’s always been there. And so has the memory of Greg’s attention, which is the greatest gift someone has to give, and one Greg gave of generously. On the annual Thanksgiving walk one year, I told him the whole convoluted plot of my first, deeply flawed novel. “Sounds cool!” he said with that smile of his. “I can’t wait to read it.” The loss left by Greg’s parting is commensurate with the magnitude of his spirit. Which is to say, it’s huge. And there’s no right way to deal with loss. I know I’ve reveled in the many pictures of him, and I’m glad his parents are organizing a project for more pictures, and more memories to flow. I just moved from a rather large upstairs unit of my house, into the quite small in-law apartment, so I did a considerable amount of downsizing. In imagining the new space, I knew I wanted a big picture of my German shepherd. I even paid to have it matted and framed. I love how she is here with me, standing guard, watching over me while I do the dishes. Pictures help. Memories help. The hardest thing about moving is sorting through stuff, and figuring out what is important, and what isn't. Asking, “What really matters?” Greg’s passing has inspired that reflection as well, in spades. But back to the Christmas memory. Just imagine, really imagine, the mind of busy guy in his early twenties, springing for a quality gift like that for his cousin. How great a guy is that? Greg’s entire life was made up of thousands of instances of generosity like that. He was the embodiment of the idea that it only takes a moment to really consider other people, and only another moment to show that appreciation. A lifetime of such moments strung together, becomes a lifetime of love. I got rid of a lot of books, clothes, cluttery things I never really needed, or was hanging on to for the wrong reasons. They say when space is limited in the kitchen, try to have things that do more than one thing. No ice crushers or melon ballers. But rest assured, Greg’s platter made the cut, and stands in a place of pride in my new, downstairs home. I think I’ll put avocados on it, or bananas. But maybe I will use it for other things, too. For marbles, or pinecones. Who knows? After all, I’m a very creative person. I know that, because Greg Walsh told me so. |
Archives
December 2024
CategoriesBlogStuff that's on my mind about books, movies, opera, dogs, and life. |
























RSS Feed